KoreaDumps CNPA 최신 PDF 버전 시험 문제집을 무료로 Google Drive에서 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gAPHGBhRF3v9oT1r8NVrAKJyl8wtQvSG
우리KoreaDumps에는 아주 엘리트 한 전문가들로 구성된 팀입니다 그들은 끈임 없는 연구와 자기자신만의 지식으로 많은 IT관연 덤프자료를 만들어 냄으로 여러분의 꿈을 이루어드립니다, 기존의 시험문제와 답과 시험문제분석 등입니다. KoreaDumps에서 제공하는Linux Foundation CNPA시험자료의 문제와 답은 실제시험의 문제와 답과 아주 비슷합니다. KoreaDumps덤프들은 모두 보장하는 덤프들이며 여러분은 과감히 KoreaDumps의 덤프를 장바구니에 넣으세요. KoreaDumps에서 여러분의 꿈을 이루어 드립니다.
| 주제 | 소개 |
|---|---|
| 주제 1 |
|
| 주제 2 |
|
| 주제 3 |
|
| 주제 4 |
|
| 주제 5 |
|
많은 분들이 고난의도인 Linux Foundation관련인증시험을 응시하고 싶어 하는데 이런 시험은 많은 전문적인 관련지식이 필요합니다. 시험은 당연히 완전히 전문적인 CNPA관련지식을 터득하자만이 패스할 가능성이 높습니다. 하지만 지금은 많은 방법들로 여러분의 부족한 면을 보충해드릴 수 있으며 또 힘든 Linux Foundation시험도 패스하실 수 있습니다. 혹은 여러분은 전문적인 Certified Cloud Native Platform Engineering Associate관련지식을 터득하자들보다 더 간단히 더 빨리 시험을 패스하실 수 있습니다.
질문 # 51
In a software deployment pipeline, what is a common purpose of having different environments like production, staging, and development?
정답:D
설명:
The primary purpose of multiple environments in software delivery pipelines is to isolate changes and test them before they reach production. Option A is correct because development, staging, and production environments provide controlled phases where teams can validate functionality, integration, performance, and security without impacting end users.
Option B (team collaboration) is facilitated by source control and workflows, not environment separation.
Option C (testing only in staging) is a risky practice and not recommended. Option D is a partial benefit- testing with different datasets helps-but the broader purpose is risk isolation.
By maintaining environment separation, organizations reduce the likelihood of bugs or misconfigurations reaching production. This practice aligns with DevOps and platform engineering principles, ensuring safer, more reliable continuous delivery.
References:- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Continuous Delivery Foundation Best Practices- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
질문 # 52
In a CI/CD pipeline, why is a build artifact (e.g., a Docker image) pushed to an OCI-compliant registry?
정답:D
설명:
In cloud native CI/CD workflows, build artifacts such as Docker/OCI images are pushed to a central container registry to ensure consistent, reproducible deployments. Option A is correct because registries serve as a single source of truth where immutable artifacts are stored, versioned, and distributed across environments.
Deployment systems like Kubernetes pull images from these registries, ensuring that the same tested artifact is deployed in staging and production.
Option B is incorrect because images cannot be directly transformed back into source code. Option C partially describes benefits (version tracking) but misses the primary function of deployment consistency. Option D is misleading-registries typically don't run automated tests; CI/CD pipelines do that before pushing the image.
By using OCI-compliant registries, organizations gain portability, interoperability, and compliance with supply chain security practices such as image signing and SBOM attestation. This ensures traceability, reliability, and secure distribution of artifacts across the platform.
References:- CNCF Supply Chain Security Whitepaper- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
질문 # 53
Which of the following best describes the primary function of an incident management system during a platform outage?
정답:B
설명:
An incident management system's primary function is to coordinate response during outages, ensuring that alerts are centralized, on-call personnel are notified, communication is managed, and visibility is maintained.
Option B is correct because it emphasizes the core responsibilities of incident management systems like PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or ServiceNow. These systems streamline response efforts, reducing mean time to recovery (MTTR).
Option A (incident documentation) is valuable but usually a secondary outcome of incident management.
Option C (root cause analysis) is part of post-incident reviews, not the primary function during active response. Option D (automated remediation) may be supported by runbooks but is not the core role of incident management systems.
By centralizing and standardizing incident response, these systems enhance collaboration, reduce confusion, and provide stakeholders with up-to-date information on incident status, which is critical for maintaining trust and operational resilience.
References:- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- SRE Incident Management Practices- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
질문 # 54
Which of the following best represents an effective golden path implementation in platform engineering?
정답:C
설명:
A golden path in platform engineering refers to a curated, opinionated workflow that makes the easiest way the right way for developers. Option C is correct because a templated workflow for deploying a microservice with integrated testing and monitoring embodies the golden path concept. It provides developers with a pre-validated, secure, and efficient approach that reduces cognitive load and accelerates delivery.
Option A (documentation) provides information but lacks automation and enforced best practices. Option B (monitoring dashboards) improves observability but does not guide developers in delivery workflows. Option D (API service catalog) is useful but more about service discovery than curated workflows.
Golden paths improve adoption by embedding guardrails, automation, and organizational standards directly into workflows, making compliance seamless. They ensure consistency while allowing developers to focus on innovation rather than platform complexity.
References:- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Team Topologies & Platform Engineering Practices- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
질문 # 55
Development teams frequently raise support tickets for short-term access to staging clusters, creating a growing burden on the platform team. What's the best long-term solution to balance control, efficiency, and developer experience?
정답:C
설명:
The most sustainable solution for managing developer access while balancing governance and self-service is to adopt GitOps-based RBAC management. Option A is correct because it leverages Git as the source of truth for access permissions, allowing developers to request access through pull requests. For non-sensitive environments such as staging, approvals can be automated, ensuring efficiency while still maintaining auditability. This approach aligns with platform engineering principles of self-service, automation, and compliance.
Option B places the burden entirely on one engineer, which does not scale. Option C introduces bottlenecks, delays, and reduces developer experience. Option D bypasses governance and auditability, potentially creating security risks.
GitOps for RBAC not only improves developer experience but also ensures all changes are versioned, reviewed, and auditable. This model supports compliance while reducing manual intervention from the platform team, thus enhancing efficiency.
References:- CNCF GitOps Principles- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
질문 # 56
......
Linux Foundation인증CNPA시험을 패스함으로 취업에는 많은 도움이 됩니다. KoreaDumps는Linux Foundation인증CNPA시험패스로 꿈을 이루어주는 사이트입니다. 우리는Linux Foundation인증CNPA시험의 문제와 답은 아주 좋은 학습자료로도 충분한 문제집입니다. 여러분이 안전하게 간단하게Linux Foundation인증CNPA시험을 응시할 수 있는 자료입니다.
CNPA합격보장 가능 덤프문제: https://www.koreadumps.com/CNPA_exam-braindumps.html
BONUS!!! KoreaDumps CNPA 시험 문제집 전체 버전을 무료로 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gAPHGBhRF3v9oT1r8NVrAKJyl8wtQvSG
We use cookies to allow better user experience. By using this website you agree to our Cookies and Privacy Policy. Dismiss